- PLoS You to. 2022; 17(6): e0270103. »
- Choice Letter 0
2022; 17 (6) : e0270103. Penned on the internet 2022 Jun 30. doi: /log.pone.0270103.r001 Johnson Chun-Sing Cheung, Section Editor Copyright © 2022 Johnson Chun-Play Cheung
This will be an open access post marketed in terms of the new Creative Commons Attribution License, and that permits open-ended explore, distribution, and you may reproduction in almost any average, considering the original author and supply is paid.
If you need and work out alter on monetary disclosure, please were your updated statement in your cover letter
Just after careful consideration, we feel that it provides quality but does not fully fulfill PLOS An individual’s book conditions because it already stands. For this reason, we invite you to submit a revised sort of this new manuscript you to definitely addresses the brand new affairs elevated for the opinion procedure.
Please fill out the changed manuscript by . If you will you prefer longer than just so it to accomplish your posts, please respond to which message or contact this new journal office from the When you’re ready add their improve, log in to and select brand new ‘Submissions In need of Revision’ folder to help you to get your own manuscript document.
An effective rebuttal letter one responds to each and every point increased by informative publisher and you can reviewer(s). You ought to publish so it page once the another document branded ‘Response so you can Reviewers’.
Reasonable-upwards copy of manuscript you to definitely shows transform made to the fresh new original type. You need to publish it while the a unique document labeled ‘Revised Manuscript having Tune Changes’.
An enthusiastic unmarked brand of your own modified papers rather than tracked change. You need to upload so it because a different document branded ‘Manuscript’.
In the event that relevant, it is recommended that you deposit their laboratory standards directly into increase new reproducibility of your abilities. assigns your method its identifier (DOI) therefore it should be cited separately afterwards. For tips select: Concurrently, PLOS One to now offers a selection for publishing fellow-reviewed Lab Protocol posts, which define standards managed with the . Find out more information about revealing protocols from the
step 1. Excite make sure that your manuscript meets PLOS Your concept criteria, in addition to those individuals to have file naming. This new PLOS You to concept templates exists from the
“So it opportunity is actually supported by a sufferers out-of Crime Operate (VOCA) government citation-compliment of give granted to function of your own Colorado Governor (OOG) Child Sex Trafficking Class and you can Traffick911. The new recruit associated with process – Traffick911 – features helped on data design and you may studies range package demonstrated in this method. Traffick911 directors provides acknowledged the latest protocol demonstrated herein. The latest views, results, findings, and you can recommendations conveyed contained in this book are the ones of journalist(s) plus don’t fundamentally reflect the new viewpoints of your own VOCA, OOG, or Traffick911.
Excite state what character the latest funders got about analysis. In the event your funders didn’t come with role, delight state: « »The newest funders had no role within the data structure, analysis collection and you can studies, choice to share, or planning of one’s manuscript. » »
Excite include that it amended Part out of Funder report on the defense letter; we’re going to replace the on the internet submission mode on your behalf.
step what is the difference between Amarillo, TX women and american women 3. Your ethics report is always to merely are available in the ways part of your own manuscript. If your ethics report is written in every part as well as the Procedures, excite remove they of any kind of area.
Reviewer #1: It process means a significant research of an enthusiastic anti-sex trafficking program, and the resulting analyses will likely feel a significant introduction toward job
p2: The statistic having 3 hundred,000 at the-risk childhood should be made clear, due to the fact bounds where youngsters are thought on the line from inside the that it citation won’t be the same because the those people used later in the methods to choose and therefore men and women are “on the line” and qualified to receive the application form. The language can be changed on these basic paragraphs and in the ways to make it clear towards the viewer that difference can be obtained.